Friday, October 20, 2006
"The most common question I get is, 'When are we going to run out of oil?' The correct response is, 'Never.'"
Eric Cheney is a University of Washington economic geologist. He's not related to the other Cheney, although I imagine that they agree on the answer to the question that Eric Cheney answered.
I'm sure that both are correct. Science and technology will provide answers if we are willing to apply them to any problem.
Eric Cheney is a University of Washington economic geologist. He's not related to the other Cheney, although I imagine that they agree on the answer to the question that Eric Cheney answered.
I'm sure that both are correct. Science and technology will provide answers if we are willing to apply them to any problem.
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Attention gooks, camel jockeys, and future North Korean losers: your ticket is going to be punched--harder Upgrades Give A-10s New Capabilities
The A-10 is one of my favorite aircraft of all time, along with the "Buff". The B-52 is getting an upgrade as well; even worse news for the bad guys.
The A-10 is one of my favorite aircraft of all time, along with the "Buff". The B-52 is getting an upgrade as well; even worse news for the bad guys.
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Tim Blair's post, "Cease All Movement, captures a big issue in the global warming kerfuffle: "environmentalists" say that scientists are all in agreement that global warming is real, and is due to human industrial activity.
However, lack of debate and continuing research isn't scientific. Scientists haven't given in to demands that they stop research--even under penalty of death. Otherwise, the example made of Giordano Bruno would have "settled" the question of whether the earth was the center of the universe.
More on the chilling effects of scientific censorship here.
H/T: Instapundit.
However, lack of debate and continuing research isn't scientific. Scientists haven't given in to demands that they stop research--even under penalty of death. Otherwise, the example made of Giordano Bruno would have "settled" the question of whether the earth was the center of the universe.
More on the chilling effects of scientific censorship here.
H/T: Instapundit.
Now they're calling John Murtha a "mouth breather". This article, entitled 'Confessions of a 'Defeatocrat' in the Washington Post today, is credited to Congressman Murtha but reads like it was ghost written by the "democratic underground", appears to make the case for Instapundit's correspondent.
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Republican election angst roundup over at Instapundit.
I'm no expert. I agree that the Republicans have done less than their majorities in both houses could have enabled them to do. However, it's hard for the Democrats to establish that they offered anything other than "no" to any new thinking on entitlements and other real problems, and certainly no serious alternative on Iraq other than "redeployment."
It's a dangerous world. We need serious people in government. If all the Democrats were like Senator Liberman, I'd say that the outcome wouldn't matter too much in the sense that national security would be assured in any case. However, the Democrats gloat over kicking Liberman out of their party. That and their other pronouncements on Iraq and the the war on terror gives me no reason to be comfortable with them influencing national policy at any level.
I'm no expert. I agree that the Republicans have done less than their majorities in both houses could have enabled them to do. However, it's hard for the Democrats to establish that they offered anything other than "no" to any new thinking on entitlements and other real problems, and certainly no serious alternative on Iraq other than "redeployment."
It's a dangerous world. We need serious people in government. If all the Democrats were like Senator Liberman, I'd say that the outcome wouldn't matter too much in the sense that national security would be assured in any case. However, the Democrats gloat over kicking Liberman out of their party. That and their other pronouncements on Iraq and the the war on terror gives me no reason to be comfortable with them influencing national policy at any level.
Friday, October 13, 2006
Often, when reading a post on The Belmont Club, the best comment is simply, "Yeah, that's right--what he said."
This post, on the NYT belated awakening to the crisis in North Korea, is no exception.
This post, on the NYT belated awakening to the crisis in North Korea, is no exception.
Jeremy Lovell of Reuters writes, "Failing to fight global warming now will cost trillions of dollars by the end of the century even without counting biodiversity loss or unpredictable events like the Gulf Stream shutting down, a study said on Friday.
But acting now will avoid some of the massive damage and cost relatively little, said the study commissioned by Friends of the Earth from the Global Development and Environment Institute of Tufts University in the United States."
Gee, the Friends of the Earth paid for a study, and it spells disaster unless we do what they say.
Meanwhile, the guys over at Climate Audit continue to poke holes in the "settled science" around global warming.
But acting now will avoid some of the massive damage and cost relatively little, said the study commissioned by Friends of the Earth from the Global Development and Environment Institute of Tufts University in the United States."
Gee, the Friends of the Earth paid for a study, and it spells disaster unless we do what they say.
Meanwhile, the guys over at Climate Audit continue to poke holes in the "settled science" around global warming.
Thursday, October 05, 2006
George Soros goes on Neil Cavuto's show on Fox News, demands that the conversation turn away from tax shelters to "Policy" as described by the Media Blog on National Review Online: Soros Blows Fuse, Rants At Cavuto for Getting "Personal".
I think that the perfect follow up question would have been, "All right, Mr. Soros, what's your policy on tax evasion?"
I think that the perfect follow up question would have been, "All right, Mr. Soros, what's your policy on tax evasion?"
If Drudge is right, the Foleygate mess is a terrible prank gone awry, and a terrible indictment of the press and the Democrat party.
Again, if Drudge is right, one wonders how the electorate will react, and whether the Democrats will suffer in November.
Again, if Drudge is right, one wonders how the electorate will react, and whether the Democrats will suffer in November.
Now this is funny: "Mexico warns U.S. of referral to UN over border fencing plan."
I mean, how dare the U.S. enforce its border!
I mean, how dare the U.S. enforce its border!
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
On Foleygate, I agree with this emailer to the National Review Online.
Update: Hugh Hewitt links to a Drudge Report post that reports a leak from ABC that included the identity and age of the young recipient of the IMs in question.
Update: Hugh Hewitt links to a Drudge Report post that reports a leak from ABC that included the identity and age of the young recipient of the IMs in question.
One of my favorite sites, Betsy's Page, links to a post entitled "CBS 'FreeSpeech' a barn burner" over at The Anchoress.
The Left's schadenfreude over the Foley scandal is, in part, based on the impression that the Republicans claim the mantle of the party of values, and that scandals like the Foley scandal expose at least one elected Republican as a hypocrite. However, as Betsy points out, Republicans have been punished more and have done the honorable thing and resigned, while Democrats who have engaged in worse conduct--actual sex in a sex scandal, for example--have survived and been reelected.
Of course, this brings to mind that old saw that the public gets the government that it deserves. We deserve better--campaigns that deal with issues and a press that reports them honestly. If we allow the politics of personal destruction to succeed in moving the electorate from the issues and the lack of real plans from the Democrat party to do anything other that undo the progress made by the Republicans and to reinstitute the same failed policies that lead to economic and foreign policy malaise, then we will have failed the country as an electorate.
The Left's schadenfreude over the Foley scandal is, in part, based on the impression that the Republicans claim the mantle of the party of values, and that scandals like the Foley scandal expose at least one elected Republican as a hypocrite. However, as Betsy points out, Republicans have been punished more and have done the honorable thing and resigned, while Democrats who have engaged in worse conduct--actual sex in a sex scandal, for example--have survived and been reelected.
Of course, this brings to mind that old saw that the public gets the government that it deserves. We deserve better--campaigns that deal with issues and a press that reports them honestly. If we allow the politics of personal destruction to succeed in moving the electorate from the issues and the lack of real plans from the Democrat party to do anything other that undo the progress made by the Republicans and to reinstitute the same failed policies that lead to economic and foreign policy malaise, then we will have failed the country as an electorate.
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Could anyone want Hillarycare after reading this? Deroy Murdock on Stethoscope Socialism by Amy Ridenour.
Here's a topic that we can all enjoy: The Longneck Tail A revolution in American beer, by Jay R. Brooks.
I'll have to think about this article by Pete Hegseth, a former officer in the 101st Airborne on the need for more troops in Iraq.
According to OpinionJourmal.com, First Lt. Hegseth served as an infantry platoon leader and civil-military operations officer in Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division.
According to OpinionJourmal.com, First Lt. Hegseth served as an infantry platoon leader and civil-military operations officer in Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)